<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cuparia &#187; Surveys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/category/surveys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog</link>
	<description>Observations from the Cuparium</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:50:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Power Rays for Every Occasion</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2009/01/10/189/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2009/01/10/189/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Ghost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just realized I forgot to mention a new addition (uploaded 12 December 2008) to the odd reference page at the Cuparium, namely Powers of Space Ghost.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realized I forgot to mention a new addition (uploaded 12 December 2008) to the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd">odd reference</a> page at the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com">Cuparium</a>, namely <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/space_ghost.html">Powers of Space Ghost</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2009/01/10/189/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cosmic Liquidator</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/03/13/133/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/03/13/133/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/03/13/133/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the end of the Futuristic Small Arms of Film and Television list, there is a short list of toy science fiction weapons that have no direct connection to any film, television show, or literary source. One of these, which I had labelled &#8220;Liquidator [by ?]&#8220;, was the original continuous stream water gun, predating the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/small_arms.html">Futuristic Small Arms of Film and Television</a> list, there is a short list of toy science fiction weapons that have no direct connection to any film, television show, or literary source. One of these, which I had labelled &#8220;Liquidator [by ?]&#8220;, was the original continuous stream water gun, predating the first Super Soaker by a decade. I owned one of these. I saw the television commercial (back when I was a lad capable of being influenced by advertising), and my mother, an ardent lover of science fiction, fantasy, and swashbuckling adventure of any kind, bought me one. I guess it was about 1978. It was, indeed, the emperor of all squirt guns, and I played with it rather too often and hard, for eventually some mechanism involving the pump or the loss of the hose forced me to use the gun as a toy gun rather than a functioning water weapon, so to speak.</p>
<p>I decided to do a Google search to see if I could find the name of the manufacturer, and lo and behold, I stumbled upon <a href="http://www.isoaker.com/Armoury/soaker_stats.cfm?soakerID=cosmicliquidator">this site</a>, wherein I learned that its full name (as I suspected it might be, but was unsure) was the <em>Cosmic</em> Liquidator, and that it was manufactured by Sun Products Corporation. The site has a full review and extensive photographs of what had been one of my favorite toys when I was growing up.</p>
<p>I think I may still have my old Cosmic Liquidator somewhere at my parents&#8217; house or my grandmother&#8217;s house, but it&#8217;s probably in a very sorry state.</p>
<p>Suddenly I feel the urge to get into a squirt gun fight. Or should that be squirt gunfight? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/03/13/133/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Futuristic Small Arms in Film and Television Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/02/27/132/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/02/27/132/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sf weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/02/27/132/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Futuristic Small Arms in Film and Television is a list or survey of science fiction weapons from live-action films and television shows as well as comic strips. Included are pistols, rifles, portable artillery, and suitable futuristic hand-to-hand weapons. Excluded are unique weapons (e.g. the Glaive from Krull, the Demat Gun from Doctor Who, the Positronic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/small_arms.html">Futuristic Small Arms in Film and Television</a> is a list or survey of science fiction weapons from live-action films and television shows as well as comic strips. Included are pistols, rifles, portable artillery, and suitable futuristic hand-to-hand weapons. Excluded are unique weapons (e.g. the Glaive from <i>Krull</i>, the Demat Gun from <i>Doctor Who</i>, the Positronic Ray from <i>Barbarella</i>), weapons that can be used only once (e.g. Cyberbombs, Dalekanium Bombs, and Nova Devices from <i>Doctor Who</i>), and doomsday weapons (e.g. the Doomsday Device from <i>Doctor Strangelove</i>, the Time Destructor from <i>Doctor Who</i>).</p>
<p>Please feel free to leave comments or suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/02/27/132/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alpha 1</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/01/28/128/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/01/28/128/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/01/28/128/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Award for Most Redundant Name for a Robot in a Film or Television Show goes to Alpha 1 from the episode &#8220;Alpha&#8221; of the television show, The Flash. Alpha 1 tells us that her name stands for &#8220;Artificial Lifelike Prototype Humanoid Android One.&#8221; That could almost be a new game&#8230; called Alpha 1. Rule [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Award for Most Redundant Name for a Robot in a Film or Television Show goes to <b>Alpha 1</b> from the episode &#8220;Alpha&#8221; of the television show, <i>The Flash</i>. Alpha 1 tells us that her name stands for &#8220;Artificial Lifelike Prototype Humanoid Android One.&#8221; That could almost be a new game&#8230; called Alpha 1.</p>
<p>Rule Number 1. Make an acronym of an existing word.<br />
Rule Number 2. Make it as redundant as possible.<br />
Rule Number 3. Make it robot appropriate.</p>
<p><i>Example</i>: <b>Beta 2</b>: Brainless Experimental Test Automaton Two</p>
<p>Alpha 1 is the newest addition to <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/robots.html">Robots in Film and Television</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2008/01/28/128/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Survey of Puppetry in Film?</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2007/08/24/95/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2007/08/24/95/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Puppetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2007/08/24/95/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it might be useful to compile a list of films that have used puppets. I first started thinking about this after reading Bil Baird&#8217;s The Art of the Puppet, with its many stills and backstage photographs of filmed puppet productions, including Baird&#8217;s own. Then I finally succeeded in seeing Santa Claus&#8217; Punch and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it might be useful to compile a list of films that have used puppets. I first started thinking about this after reading Bil Baird&#8217;s <i>The Art of the Puppet</i>, with its many stills and backstage photographs of filmed puppet productions, including Baird&#8217;s own. Then I finally succeeded in seeing <i>Santa Claus&#8217; Punch and Judy</i>, a short film from 1948 featuring the masterful puppetry of George Prentice (and viewable <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/santa_claus_punch_and_judy">here</a>). Then I read some articles on marionettes such as <a href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/01/17/marionettes-go-hollywood/">Marionettes Go Hollywood</a> in old issues of <i>Popular Science</i> or <a href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/">Modern Mechanix</a>, wherein I learned that Jack Benny was in a musical comedy in 1937 called <i>Artists and Models</i>, which featured a musical number with marionettes.</p>
<p>This may be a daunting task, but it would be nice to add something practical and unrelated to science fiction to the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd">odd reference</a> page. Many of these films are truly useful for research purposes where puppeteers and puppet builders are concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2007/08/24/95/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ships of Star Trek Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2007/06/20/68/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2007/06/20/68/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaceships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2007/06/20/68/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ongoing addition of Star Trek ships to the Spaceships of Film and Television page has proved unwieldy, so I have transferred them to the newly established Ships of Star Trek page in the Cuparium. Do not, however, expect to see any vessels from Star Trek: Enterprise, for it is anathema as far as I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ongoing addition of <i>Star Trek</i> ships to the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/spaceships.html">Spaceships of Film and Television</a> page has proved unwieldy, so I have transferred them to the newly established <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/star_trek_ships.html">Ships of Star Trek</a> page in the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com">Cuparium</a>. Do not, however, expect to see any vessels from <i>Star Trek: Enterprise</i>, for it is anathema as far as I am concerned. The spin-off series are bad enough (except for <i>Star Trek: Voyager</i>, which has its merits), but a prequel series? <strong>Bah!</strong></p>
<p>I shall desist from ranting further on the subject&#8230; for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2007/06/20/68/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spaceships in Film and Television Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/10/14/58/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/10/14/58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaceships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/10/14/58/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I posted a list in progress at the Cuparium, namely Spaceships in Film and Television. This time I shall not mirror it on three pages. If you wish to view it, click on the link; if you wish to vote on your favorite spaceship, you may do so here or in the posting in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, I posted a list in progress at the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com">Cuparium</a>, namely <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/spaceships.html">Spaceships in Film and Television</a>. This time I shall not mirror it on three pages. If you wish to view it, click on the link; if you wish to vote on your favorite spaceship, you may do so here or in the <a href="http://cuparius.livejournal.com/24622.html">posting</a> in <a href="http://cuparius.livejournal.com">Mr. Cooper&#8217;s Journal</a>. Be seeing you&#8230; :-?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/10/14/58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By the Rings of Saturn! New Links!</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/25/49/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/25/49/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/25/49/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have updated the links page at the Cuparium for the first time since November 2005. I&#8217;m not sure why I waited so long.  I have also added some colorful expressions originating with Tom Corbett, Space Cadet to the Swearwords of Science Fiction and Fantasy glossary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have updated the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/links.html">links</a> page at the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com">Cuparium</a> for the first time since November 2005. I&#8217;m not sure why I waited so long.</p>
<p> I have also added some colorful expressions originating with <em>Tom Corbett, Space Cadet</em> to the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/swearwords.html">Swearwords of Science Fiction and Fantasy</a> glossary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/25/49/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breath of Issus!</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/11/46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/11/46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/11/46/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just updated the Robots in Film and Television survey, and the Swearwords of Science Fiction and Fantasy lexicon has been expanded to twice its former size.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just updated the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/04/24/13/">Robots in Film and Television survey</a>, and the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/swearwords.html">Swearwords of Science Fiction and Fantasy lexicon</a> has been expanded to twice its former size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/11/46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computers, Robots, and Questionable Vocabulary</title>
		<link>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/06/45/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/06/45/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 03:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuparius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fictional expletives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sf computers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/06/45/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve added a new subsection to the words section of the Cuparium. Odd Reference is where I collect certain surveys, lists, glossaries, and other informational miscellany that appeal to me. Such are my time-squandering powers: Robots in Film and Television Futuristic Computers in Film and Television Swearwords of Science Fiction and Fantasy The first two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve added a new subsection to the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words">words</a> section of the <a href="http://www.cuparius.com">Cuparium</a>. <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd">Odd Reference</a> is where I collect certain surveys, lists, glossaries, and other informational miscellany that appeal to me. Such are my time-squandering powers:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/robots.html">Robots in Film and Television</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/computers.html">Futuristic Computers in Film and Television</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/swearwords.html">Swearwords of Science Fiction and Fantasy</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The first two started as surveys here and in my LiveJournal site. If you wish to comment or suggest additions, the Cuplog versions are <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/04/24/13/">here for robots</a> and <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/06/44/">here for computers</a>; <a href="http://cuparius.livejournal.com">Mr. Cooper&#8217;s Journal</a> versions are <a href="http://cuparius.livejournal.com/4658.html">here for robots</a> and <a href="http://cuparius.livejournal.com/16530.html">here for computers</a>. Confused? Fear not. All mirrors are hyperlinked to one another.</p>
<p>If you wish to make comments or suggestions for my new <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/swearwords.html">dictionary of science fiction and fantasy swearwords</a>, that page did <strong>not</strong> start as a survey, so please feel free to comment here, or in the <a href="http://cuparius.livejournal.com/16885.html">swearword announcement</a> at Mr. Cooper&#8217;s Journal.</p>
<p>As for this <a href="http://www.cuparius.com/words/odd/swearwords.html">lexicon of speculative foul language</a>, I was prompted partially by an appreciation for any sign of creativity in a form of human expression that has become increasingly barren. To be honest, I enjoy venting my harsher emotions in a manner that surprises, confuses, and yet doesn&#8217;t quite descend to a level of crudity that ought to be beneath me. &#8216;Tis a fine way to promote lexicography, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuparius.com/cuplog/2006/09/06/45/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

