Archive for February, 2012

Reclaiming the Blade (2009) Reviewed

Monday, February 13th, 2012

Reclaiming the Blade is a documentary about an interesting subject: the sword, its place in history and culture, and a rediscovery of the martial arts of the western world in which the sword played a central role. In the hands of a superior documentary filmmaker, it could have been brilliant, but alas, it is not. Apparently made with an ADHD audience in mind, it assails the viewer with wholly unnecessary and uninformative computer graphics, presents multiple rapid sequences of snippets of fight scenes from movies and re-enactments, and allows numerous interviewees to repeat themselves endlessly about points that are further beaten to death by narrator John Rhys-Davies, whose voice is frequently drowned out by the bland yet bombastic music.

There are good points, such as the interviews with legendary fight choreographer Bob Anderson and actor Viggo Mortensen, but they should have been longer. An entire documentary could focus on Anderson alone and his contributions to, and observations about, swordplay in motion pictures. The subject of the loss and rebirth of the European martial arts traditions is certainly worth another documentary, which could discuss in greater detail the authors of the various instruction manuals of the Renaissance and show the progress that has been made in relearning these forgotten combat techniques in a more comprehensive and systematic manner than the MTV-style editing and camerawork favored by writer/director Daniel McNicoll. The forging of swords, in history and the present, also lends itself to a documentary of its own.

Reclaiming the Blade is flawed, and I would prefer to see its subjects explored by more serious, scholarly, and experienced filmmakers, but it has its merits if one is willing to see past the dross.

Besiegers Be Damned

Sunday, February 12th, 2012

I should stop reading the spam comments that attempt to break through the Cuparium‘s outer walls. Sometimes I read them before I delete them, and the more humorous ones get posted (sans links) on my Facebook wall for the purpose of mockery. For Cuparia alone I have personally deleted over 12,000 spam comments since it went online (and if certain keywords were not blacklisted, I’m sure it would be at least ten times that amount). At any rate, I often read the spam comments before obliterating them if they are not too long and incomprehensible, but afterwards, when I begin to write an article for Cuparia or Fudgerylog, I can hear my mental voice impersonating them. I regain my bearings in a matter of seconds, but it’s a disturbing experience. One moment I sound like myself, and the next I can hear myself think, “Gratitudes for the unexpected lookups,” or some other incoherent phrase that frequently occurs in mistranslated foreign spam. It’s a mental poison delivered by electronic pollution, and if it cannot be eradicated, it ought to be ignored. So, I’ll be ignoring it in the future, even if it means the occasional spam comment will escape public mockery at my hands.

Swashbuckler (1976) Reviewed

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

The generically named Swashbuckler (1976) is, indeed, generic, which does not, unfortunately, prevent it from being distinctly bad. Much of the credit for the film’s shortcomings belong to the screenplay. There are limits to what even the greatest actors can do with a rotten script, which is why they are normally choosy (although there are occasional lapses of judgment as in the cases of Robert Shaw, James Earl Jones, and Geneviève Bujold). There is, however, no shortage of actors willing to turn in an appalling performance appropriate to the lousiness of their lines (for which we may be truly thankful to Peter Boyle and Beau Bridges).

Set in Jamaica in 1718, we are informed at the beginning of the film that this is the glorious age of piracy, when buccaneers fought the oppressive rule of colonial governors throughout the Caribbean, and that the most famous pirate of all was Captain Ned Lynch. This is straightforward enough. We have the setting, the conflict, the protagonist, and the antagonist neatly summarized. Undoubtedly there will be piratical antics, imperialist depredations, wrongs to be righted, and a love-hate romantic interest thrown in somewhere. But first things first. Something bad is about to happen to someone we don’t know, but we know they don’t deserve it because the townspeople we don’t know appear to disapprove. In this case the victim is Nick Debrett (Jones), who is about to be hanged by the lazily named Major Folly (Bridges), which is contrary to the wishes of the general population of Kingston, Jamaica. As luck would have it (and as the music informs us in no uncertain terms), the heroes arrive just in the nick of time aboard the good ship Blarney Cock (played by the Golden Hinde II, a full-scale replica of Sir Francis Drake’s famous ship) and save the day with cannon fire, rope-swinging, and piratey boisterousness. At this point we are introduced to Captain Ned Lynch (Shaw), who loves nothing better than fighting, robbing, wenching, and composing limericks.

In short order we are also introduced to Lord Durant (Boyle), the decadent, depraved, despotic governor of Jamaica whose 20th century American accent does nothing to undermine the quality of the fine script. We are also introduced to Lord Durant’s most prominent oppressed citizens, our heroine Jane Barnet (Bujold) and her mother, Lady Barnet (Louisa Horton), who have been evicted from their mansion and deprived of their possessions after Sir James Barnet (Bernard Behrens) is found guilty of integrity and therefore imprisoned.

The story, of course, leads inexorably to encounters (and conflict) between Ned Lynch and Jane Barnet, conflict between them and Lord Durant, and the inevitable Daring Rescue Attempt followed by the inevitable Climactic Duel. (I’m not giving anything away. Every element of the plot is announced via semaphore by a flag-wielding screenwriter.)

It is a pity such beautiful cinematography and scenery were wasted on such an utterly banal story and apparently random casting. If Avery Schreiber can land a role in the film (as the pirate Polonski), it is surely an indicator that nothing should be taken seriously. The stunts and fight scenes are functional, but largely unremarkable. As a whole, despite the location and obviously substantial budget, Swashbuckler seems more like a 1970s made-for-television movie than a period adventure film intended for the silver screen. There is never that moment of immersion into the story that is so necessarily a part of any good movie, especially an escapist one.

Swashbuckler has one factor that simultaneously redeems and condemns it: Peter Boyle as Lord Durant. Playing his part just as dreadfully as it was written, Boyle reduces his character to the dimensions of a villain in a Mel Brooks comedy (coincidentally having starred in Young Frankenstein two years earlier). Amongst his lines, some of the most absurd include, “Let the bitch try and take me,” “I serve one master, and his name is Darkness,” and, fittingly, “Draw the curtains. The farce is ended!” — a line exclaimed just prior to falling off a balcony.

  • Writing: Terrible
  • Directing: Fair
  • Acting: Poor (Peter Boyle: Terrible)
  • Cinematography: Good
  • Stunts: Good
  • Swordplay: Fair
  • Panache: Mediocre

Overall Rating: Mediocre
Swashbuckling Rank: Fair

Adventures of Don Juan (1948) Reviewed

Wednesday, February 1st, 2012

In Adventures of Don Juan (1948), Errol Flynn returns to full color swashbuckling as the most famous ladies’ man in history. Beginning with one such adventure in progress, the film quickly progresses to more important matters as Don Juan finds himself involved — through no fault of his own — in affairs of the state (ahem) and an alliance with the formidable Queen Margaret (Viveca Lindfors). All is not well in Spain, for King Phillip III (Romney Brent) is weak, and his diabolical advisor, the Duke de Lorca (Robert Douglas), is far stronger than he appears and far more interested in reviving dreams of conquest than pursuing international peace.

Eight years after The Sea Hawk, Flynn proves that his charm, candor, and swordsmanship are as sharp as ever. Regal of bearing and complex of character, Lindfors is more than worthy of her role as queen and provides the ultimate foil for the film’s amorous yet well-intentioned hero. Brent is quite capable as the less-than-capable king, and Douglas is everything one could ask for in a devious, torture-minded warmonger. Alan Hale, of course, is suitable as Alan Hale, Loyal Sidekick (or Leporello as he is billed in the credits).

Beautifully filmed in vivid color, and masterfully scored by Max Steiner, Adventures of Don Juan is an adventure film with excitement, humor, and surprising depth.

  • Writing: Good
  • Directing: Great
  • Acting: Great
  • Cinematography: Good
  • Stunts: Great
  • Swordplay: Great
  • Panache: Great

Overall Rating: Great
Swashbuckling Rank: Great